Skip to main content

Top 25 H1B Consumers in 2007 To Speak Up

Top 25 Consumers of H1B in 2007 (that account to almost 20,000 Visas) now have to speak up about how they use H1B applicants.  Senators Dick Durbin and Chuck Grassley have sent letters to these companies seeking answers to an array of questions that will reveal how these companies use H1B petitions. Click here to view a copy of the letter.

I guess, this is particularly relevant in the wake of two new bills submitted to increase the numerical limitation on H1Bs.

Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) sent a letter  today to the top 25 recipients of approved H-1B visa petitions in 2007, seeking detailed information on how each firm uses the visa program. These firms were responsible for nearly 20,000 of the available H-1B visas last year.

  1. Infosys Technologies Ltd.,
  2. Wipro Limited,
  3. Satyam Computer Services Ltd.,
  4. Cognizant Tech Solutions,
  5. Microsoft Corporation,
  6. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd.,
  7. Patni Computer Systems Inc.,
  8. US Technology Resources LLC,
  9. I-Flex Solutions Inc.,
  10. Intel Corporation,
  11. Accenture LLP,
  12. Cisco Systems Inc.,
  13. Ernst & Young LLP,
  14. Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd.,
  15. Deloitte & Touche LLP,
  16. Google Inc.,
  17. Mphasis Corporation,
  18. University of Illinois at Chicago,
  19. American Unit Inc.,
  20. Jsmn International Inc.,
  21. Objectwin Technology Inc.,
  22. Deloitte Consulting,
  23. Prince Georges County Public Schools,
  24. JPMorgan Chase and Co., and
  25. Motorola Inc.

Source: United States Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa

Numbers don't lie

It is quite evident from the numbers that, a very significant number of those companies are from India and as I understand the nature and intent of their H1B applicants is to come and work for US clients and coordinate out sourcing efforts and in most cases moving more jobs to India.

Another interesting issue is, as Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates said in his testimony that companies like Microsoft may loose edge as they fail to garner global talent. In short, they are not getting enough H1Bs as other Indian counter parts are consuming a lot more and becoming a direct competitor for H1Bs.

So, what will happen now?

So how this problem is solved? Will Increase in H1B  solve this issue? Or restricting Indian counter parts will reduce the impact?

If USCIS just increase the numbers, what is the guarantee that non-US companies won't consume a higher number again and leading to the same situation as today?

Can Indian companies offer a justification that stand a chance?

It is quite interesting to see how Indian companies defend their high numbers with reference to Competition and innovation argument in USA. Lack of such a justifiable explanation could definitely lead to restrictions imposed on these companies that may restrict if not prevent these companies getting such a high number  of H1Bs.

Update: Full List of H1B Consumers of 2007 can be accessed here in an excel sheet at Information Week :  Excel File

Popular posts from this blog

You Are What You Think People Think About You

There are about 6.7 Billion people in this world that we know of.  Whether you believe in ‘Creation’ or ‘Evolution’, this human race started with a tiny number. It is quite amazing to see how fast it multiplies. What is more amazing is that every single individual in that 6 billion crowd is born ‘unique’.  Quite literally, you are born to be one in a billion, whether you believe it or not. “ This was the Introduction to my latest and last speech in Toast Masters club, ‘One in a Billion’ as part of International Speech contest. 
As much as I believe that each one of us can be that 'one in a billion' personality, I admit the reality as I perceive it and some times feel alone in that belief.
A famous quote says 'You are what you think'. It is also true that 'you are what you think people think about you'. If you think people think you are smart, then you act smart and become smart. If you think people think you are dumb, you will become dumb even if you are not, a…

Cooking looks like an unforgiving art

When you are writing software, you always get a second chance. In fact, lots of chances to get it correct. You have compiler warnings, failed test cases and some times crashes alert you that something is not right and will give you a chance to correct. And you get literally unlimited chances to apply those corrections. 
Well, cooking looks to be totally unforgiving in this respect and on any given day, you may get just one chance to get it right. If you fail, you fail. Try again right away if you have patience of starting it all over. Or start over some time later or next day. But not much of a second chance to correct a mistake. 
More ruthless, when it comes to salt. If you put just a little more, even a tiny little more, it never hesitate to show what it got. Totally ruthless. End result will be a failed dish that no one will be able (and/or happy) to eat. And most dishes, you may not be able to add something little more to offset it.

Little trick I learned the hard way, start on …

Did NDTV Just Twisted Words?

I have recently spotted quite a few places where NDTV title doesn’t exactly say the same as the details in the article says. Lost in translation? or just plain twisting for journalistic sensationalism?Title says “'AAP doesn't treat women as humans,' says founder member Madhu Bhaduri as she quits”, but the quote in details says, slightly differently: “In this party, women are not considered humans” (see the text highlighted).Source : NDTV.comYou may say, they effectually mean the same thing. Is it? Even if they mean the same,  Why not use the same exact phrase in both places?