Skip to main content

Will Telcos Notice Skype? Yup, They Are Infact Scared.

Read some statistics on SkypeJournal about Skyp's growth and comparisions with Telco's traditional revenues. The author says that the dent made by Skype is so low that Telco's won't even notice Skype.

Numbers may be low. But, Telcos are infact scared of Skype and its clones all around. Go to any conference. Open any report. View any presentation or listen to any conference. Nothing starts and ends without mentioning the threat from Skype and its clones.  Why, Skype is eating out 25% of VOIP growth. Read on.

Interestingly, though, Skype's growth has not yet had a quantifiable impact on switched volumes.


  • Skype traffic grew by 6.2 billion minutes in the last year. From 7.6 billion minutes in 2005 to 13.8 billion projected in 2006. 80% year over year.

Just in case that's sounds like a lot...

  • Other VoIP traffic grew by 16.8 billion minutes to 42 billion minutes. These are the Vonages, cable and telco voip offerings.

Their growth was bigger than Skype's total traffic. But wait, there's more.

  • Swtiched telephony, grew 8% to 237 billion minutes. Switched growth was 18 billion minutes.

So even if Skype traffic is growing 10 times faster than switched service, picking up a few points of share, the Skype threat falls into telecom's background noise. Skype's revenue doesn't even fall in telecom's rounding errors.

If you look at the growth alone: Skype has around 6 Billion minutes, while Switched traffic has 18 Billion minutes and VOIP traffic has 16.8 billion minutes. That accounts to roughly 1/3 of switched traffic and roughly 1/3 of VOIP traffic as well. Quite considerable or not? I bet, its still a good number. Look at it this way: Skype is eating out 25% of Telcos VOIP growth.

It will be interesting to see categorised minutes to get a good feeling of where Skype and its clones are used the most. For example, international minutes. Skype's adoption to masses hasn't even begun due to lack of handsets. Many of us don't like to glued to PCs to make a call. We want to move around. So handsets that can directly connection internet on WiFi will change the equation drastically. At this point, though these handsets are available, they are quite expensive ( $100+). If price comes down to $40-50, it would be interesting to see how these numbers jump up for Skype. I bet, they would jump beyond expectations.

Technorati tags: , , ,

Popular posts from this blog

You Are What You Think People Think About You

There are about 6.7 Billion people in this world that we know of.  Whether you believe in ‘Creation’ or ‘Evolution’, this human race started with a tiny number. It is quite amazing to see how fast it multiplies. What is more amazing is that every single individual in that 6 billion crowd is born ‘unique’.  Quite literally, you are born to be one in a billion, whether you believe it or not. “ This was the Introduction to my latest and last speech in Toast Masters club, ‘One in a Billion’ as part of International Speech contest. 
As much as I believe that each one of us can be that 'one in a billion' personality, I admit the reality as I perceive it and some times feel alone in that belief.
A famous quote says 'You are what you think'. It is also true that 'you are what you think people think about you'. If you think people think you are smart, then you act smart and become smart. If you think people think you are dumb, you will become dumb even if you are not, a…

Cooking looks like an unforgiving art

When you are writing software, you always get a second chance. In fact, lots of chances to get it correct. You have compiler warnings, failed test cases and some times crashes alert you that something is not right and will give you a chance to correct. And you get literally unlimited chances to apply those corrections. 
Well, cooking looks to be totally unforgiving in this respect and on any given day, you may get just one chance to get it right. If you fail, you fail. Try again right away if you have patience of starting it all over. Or start over some time later or next day. But not much of a second chance to correct a mistake. 
More ruthless, when it comes to salt. If you put just a little more, even a tiny little more, it never hesitate to show what it got. Totally ruthless. End result will be a failed dish that no one will be able (and/or happy) to eat. And most dishes, you may not be able to add something little more to offset it.

Little trick I learned the hard way, start on …

Did NDTV Just Twisted Words?

I have recently spotted quite a few places where NDTV title doesn’t exactly say the same as the details in the article says. Lost in translation? or just plain twisting for journalistic sensationalism?Title says “'AAP doesn't treat women as humans,' says founder member Madhu Bhaduri as she quits”, but the quote in details says, slightly differently: “In this party, women are not considered humans” (see the text highlighted).Source : NDTV.comYou may say, they effectually mean the same thing. Is it? Even if they mean the same,  Why not use the same exact phrase in both places?