Skip to main content

Few Thoughts I Shared Elsewhere ...

At Building Flexible Platforms :

The problems you owed to the PC and the iPod example looks a bit funny. Its like comparing Electricity delivered to your home and battery on your cellphone. Electricity can do many things for many of us while cellphone just does one special thing, power the phone. Does Electricity's genericness, flexibility and non-portableness makes it any inefficient and useless than a battery?

To the point of flexible frameworks, What we must build is a platform that is agile and "flexible to adapt to any future requirements" than specially customized to current requirements.

In simple words, build frameworks and Engines. Not monolithic platforms. Blogging platforms are an excellent example. As they built engines and templates, customization and specialization became so easy. Even the evolution to the new markets is just a jiffy.

Many are tempted by specialized market segments to build a very specialized product/platform, for whatever reasons.

Most lively example, at any given day atleast one new social networking website is started that focus on a very narrow group of people.

And what inspired them to start a social networking website in the first place? Probably a myspace, a generic social networking site that caters to everybody on the web. Does this virute of 'generic and caters to all' make myspace any inefficient?

Scared of failure to differentiate is forcing some entrepreneurs to choose narrow and specialized segments, leaving the most profitable but highly competitive and broader market segments. This is all assuming that they can make money in a narrow sector with less or no competition.

Missing the whole business 101.

If there is MONEY in whatever segment you choose, there WILL BE a competition sooner than one can think of. You can't escape competition. If you must, then you are escaping money too. There is no money making business that doesn't have competition.

The Truth Behind Indian Broadband:

"Apparently more than 90% of internet traffic lands up in the US. Partly because, all the DNS servers are sitting there and no matter what, the address resolution happens there in the US."
- I am sorry. I don't quite what you are saying.

How does DNS resolution has something to do with international bandwidth consumption? 99% of time, DNS query from India never crosses the border, owing to DNS Caching, at every level in the path. Something seriously wrong with DNS Servers configured at ISPs, if they ever hit more than 1% of time.

As per my understanding, all major sites have localized servers. You might run a traceroute to see if what ISPs are saying is accurate.

Popular posts from this blog

You Are What You Think People Think About You

There are about 6.7 Billion people in this world that we know of.  Whether you believe in ‘Creation’ or ‘Evolution’, this human race started with a tiny number. It is quite amazing to see how fast it multiplies. What is more amazing is that every single individual in that 6 billion crowd is born ‘unique’.  Quite literally, you are born to be one in a billion, whether you believe it or not. “ This was the Introduction to my latest and last speech in Toast Masters club, ‘One in a Billion’ as part of International Speech contest. 
As much as I believe that each one of us can be that 'one in a billion' personality, I admit the reality as I perceive it and some times feel alone in that belief.
A famous quote says 'You are what you think'. It is also true that 'you are what you think people think about you'. If you think people think you are smart, then you act smart and become smart. If you think people think you are dumb, you will become dumb even if you are not, a…

Cooking looks like an unforgiving art

When you are writing software, you always get a second chance. In fact, lots of chances to get it correct. You have compiler warnings, failed test cases and some times crashes alert you that something is not right and will give you a chance to correct. And you get literally unlimited chances to apply those corrections. 
Well, cooking looks to be totally unforgiving in this respect and on any given day, you may get just one chance to get it right. If you fail, you fail. Try again right away if you have patience of starting it all over. Or start over some time later or next day. But not much of a second chance to correct a mistake. 
More ruthless, when it comes to salt. If you put just a little more, even a tiny little more, it never hesitate to show what it got. Totally ruthless. End result will be a failed dish that no one will be able (and/or happy) to eat. And most dishes, you may not be able to add something little more to offset it.

Little trick I learned the hard way, start on …

Did NDTV Just Twisted Words?

I have recently spotted quite a few places where NDTV title doesn’t exactly say the same as the details in the article says. Lost in translation? or just plain twisting for journalistic sensationalism?Title says “'AAP doesn't treat women as humans,' says founder member Madhu Bhaduri as she quits”, but the quote in details says, slightly differently: “In this party, women are not considered humans” (see the text highlighted).Source : NDTV.comYou may say, they effectually mean the same thing. Is it? Even if they mean the same,  Why not use the same exact phrase in both places?