Skip to main content

Analysts Theory vs Entrepreneur's experience to successfully build a company

Business2.0 Magazine published a cover page article in its June 2006 issue called "How to build a bullet proof startup - A 16 step plan to turn your big idea into the next Google". As usual, the guys who compiled this article are not entrepreneurs themselves, but must have compiled the article by doing some research. If anybody has a secret 16 step formula to make it to Google, he/she must have started one for himself. But like any other consultant or so called analysts, they wrote what they think will help based on research. Not from first hand experience. People who had first hand experience most cases will be busy in turning another dream to reality.

This is nothing new. All analysts and consultants, and most financial advisors who talk about how to make millions on stockmarket, never did anything great for themselves. They haven't earned millions. Most often, they are employed or earn their income on their analysis. They can only advise but can never act. Same case with this article.

But entrepreneurs who had first hand experience of what it takes to start up and run a successful business did not agree. Here is a response at 37 signals: How to shoot a bullet through your startup David 24 May 2006 If you argue who is right, with common sense approach and for argument sake many people find both are right. But few people who understand the difference and understand what is right for him/her will be moving one step forward in creating their dreams.

I believe, with my limited experience in starting and running a company successful company, there is no silver bullet. No fool-proof mechanism. No bullet proof startup. No 16 point plan that can make a startup company the next Google. Understand that Business2.0 has successfully sold its magazine. That is indeed a success story. If this article brings some new perspective, that is great. I don;t believe any serious entrepreneur looks at this article and rely solely on this 16 point plan to succeed. If that is the case, every start up would have become a next Google by now, because there is nothing new in this article that was not communicated earlier by thousands of authors, blogs and analysis papers and most important, the History of entrepreneurship itself.

Popular posts from this blog

You Are What You Think People Think About You

There are about 6.7 Billion people in this world that we know of.  Whether you believe in ‘Creation’ or ‘Evolution’, this human race started with a tiny number. It is quite amazing to see how fast it multiplies. What is more amazing is that every single individual in that 6 billion crowd is born ‘unique’.  Quite literally, you are born to be one in a billion, whether you believe it or not. “ This was the Introduction to my latest and last speech in Toast Masters club, ‘One in a Billion’ as part of International Speech contest. 
As much as I believe that each one of us can be that 'one in a billion' personality, I admit the reality as I perceive it and some times feel alone in that belief.
A famous quote says 'You are what you think'. It is also true that 'you are what you think people think about you'. If you think people think you are smart, then you act smart and become smart. If you think people think you are dumb, you will become dumb even if you are not, a…

Cooking looks like an unforgiving art

When you are writing software, you always get a second chance. In fact, lots of chances to get it correct. You have compiler warnings, failed test cases and some times crashes alert you that something is not right and will give you a chance to correct. And you get literally unlimited chances to apply those corrections. 
Well, cooking looks to be totally unforgiving in this respect and on any given day, you may get just one chance to get it right. If you fail, you fail. Try again right away if you have patience of starting it all over. Or start over some time later or next day. But not much of a second chance to correct a mistake. 
More ruthless, when it comes to salt. If you put just a little more, even a tiny little more, it never hesitate to show what it got. Totally ruthless. End result will be a failed dish that no one will be able (and/or happy) to eat. And most dishes, you may not be able to add something little more to offset it.

Little trick I learned the hard way, start on …

Did NDTV Just Twisted Words?

I have recently spotted quite a few places where NDTV title doesn’t exactly say the same as the details in the article says. Lost in translation? or just plain twisting for journalistic sensationalism?Title says “'AAP doesn't treat women as humans,' says founder member Madhu Bhaduri as she quits”, but the quote in details says, slightly differently: “In this party, women are not considered humans” (see the text highlighted).Source : NDTV.comYou may say, they effectually mean the same thing. Is it? Even if they mean the same,  Why not use the same exact phrase in both places?