Skip to main content

100 Million Mobile Subscribers in India ???

Indian Mobile Subscribers count reaches 100 Million mark at the end of May, 2006 as per a news report. Cellular Operators Association of India's website however reported only 75,290,092 for May, 2006 on its website. Seems to be some confusion or a miraculous sales in May, 2006 and the COAI website reports stats at the beginning of the month.

In April, India added only 2.93 Million mobiles. But it is surprising and doubtful that it added around 25 Million in one month. Cellular Operators Association of India did not release any notification. So the count stands at 75.3 Million by end of May, 2006.

Update: I found a press release issued by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), that has the stats showing 101 Milliong mobile subscribers. But somehow, the numbers does not add up from COAI site to TRAI. Something is missing. May be COAI does not include Wireless Local Loop(WLL) phones that Reliance offers through out India. If that is the case, then it is an excellent feat by Reliance that it got 25 Millions with in three years after the launch.

5. `100 Million Mobiles’ Club: With this India has become the 5th country having more than 100 million mobile subscribers. The five ‘100 Million Mobile Club Countries’ are:-
i) China – 408 Million (March 2006)
ii) USA – 170 Million (January 2006)
iii) Japan – 141 Million (January 2006)
iv) Russia – 130 Million (February 2006)
v) India – 101 Million (May 2006)

How India got there ? In the last three years India added a whopping 94 Million Mobile subscribers.

The total mobile additions in the years 2003,2004, 2005 and up to May 2006 are as under:-
2003 : 16 M ; 2004: 22 M; 2005 : 32 M; Jan 2005 to May 2006: 24 M; From Jan 2003 to May 2006 : 94 M

Tags: , , ,

Popular posts from this blog

You Are What You Think People Think About You

There are about 6.7 Billion people in this world that we know of.  Whether you believe in ‘Creation’ or ‘Evolution’, this human race started with a tiny number. It is quite amazing to see how fast it multiplies. What is more amazing is that every single individual in that 6 billion crowd is born ‘unique’.  Quite literally, you are born to be one in a billion, whether you believe it or not. “ This was the Introduction to my latest and last speech in Toast Masters club, ‘One in a Billion’ as part of International Speech contest. 
As much as I believe that each one of us can be that 'one in a billion' personality, I admit the reality as I perceive it and some times feel alone in that belief.
A famous quote says 'You are what you think'. It is also true that 'you are what you think people think about you'. If you think people think you are smart, then you act smart and become smart. If you think people think you are dumb, you will become dumb even if you are not, a…

Cooking looks like an unforgiving art

When you are writing software, you always get a second chance. In fact, lots of chances to get it correct. You have compiler warnings, failed test cases and some times crashes alert you that something is not right and will give you a chance to correct. And you get literally unlimited chances to apply those corrections. 
Well, cooking looks to be totally unforgiving in this respect and on any given day, you may get just one chance to get it right. If you fail, you fail. Try again right away if you have patience of starting it all over. Or start over some time later or next day. But not much of a second chance to correct a mistake. 
More ruthless, when it comes to salt. If you put just a little more, even a tiny little more, it never hesitate to show what it got. Totally ruthless. End result will be a failed dish that no one will be able (and/or happy) to eat. And most dishes, you may not be able to add something little more to offset it.

Little trick I learned the hard way, start on …

Did NDTV Just Twisted Words?

I have recently spotted quite a few places where NDTV title doesn’t exactly say the same as the details in the article says. Lost in translation? or just plain twisting for journalistic sensationalism?Title says “'AAP doesn't treat women as humans,' says founder member Madhu Bhaduri as she quits”, but the quote in details says, slightly differently: “In this party, women are not considered humans” (see the text highlighted).Source : NDTV.comYou may say, they effectually mean the same thing. Is it? Even if they mean the same,  Why not use the same exact phrase in both places?